Indicadores socioambientais aplicados na avaliação da qualidade da água no setor agrícola. Uma Revisão.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22579/22484817.1136Palavras-chave:
Indicadores socioambientais, qualidade da água, agricultura, conservação agrícolaResumo
O uso e manejo adequado dos recursos hídricos é de vital importância nas atividades desenvolvidas pelo homem, incluindo as atividades agrícolas, onde o recurso deve ser monitorado periodicamente por meio de indicadores aplicados. O objetivo geral deste estudo foi identificar indicadores socioambientais na avaliação da qualidade da água. Foi realizada uma revisão sistemática da literatura relacionada aos indicadores socioambientais aplicados à avaliação da qualidade da água no setor agrícola, incluindo documentos publicados entre os anos de 2011 a 2022. As bases de dados utilizadas foram Google Acadêmico, Science Direct, Springer Link e Scopus. Foram incluídos artigos, livros e relatórios científicos. A revisão foi realizada em quatro etapas. Os resultados refletiram que existem três abordagens aplicadas ao desenvolvimento de indicadores socioambientais associados à avaliação da qualidade da água no setor agrícola. Em relação à tendência de distribuição das pesquisas, evidenciou-se que Ásia, Europa e América apresentaram maior importância no desenvolvimento de pesquisas em indicadores socioambientais. Em países como China e Tailândia, observou-se o maior número de pesquisas associadas aos indicadores socioambientais no setor agrícola, incentivando a produção de estratégias limpas conforme o manejo dos recursos hídricos nas atividades associadas à agricultura.
Referências
• Alkan, J., Bockstaller, C., Stapleton, L. M., Ewert, F., Knapen, R., Therond, O., Geniaux, G., Bellon, S., Correira, T. P., Turpin, N. y Bezlepkina, I. (2009). A goal-oriented indicator framework to support integrated assessment of new policies for agri- environmental systems. Environmental Science & Policy, 12(5), 562-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.012
• Bergez, J. E., Béthinger, A., Bockstaller, C., Cederberg, C., Ceschia, E., Guilpart, N., Lange, S., Müller, F., Reidsma, P., Riviere, C., Schader, C., Therond, O. y van der Werf, H. M. G. (2022). Integrating agri-environmental indicators, ecosystem services assessment, life cycle assessment and yield gap analysis to assess the environmental sustainability of agricultura. Ecological Indicators, 141, 1109107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109107
• Bi, S.,Wang, L., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Wang, Z., Ding, X. y Zhou, J. (2021). A Comprehensive Method for Water Environment Assessment considering Trends of Water Quality. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021(1), 5548113. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5548113
• Bockstaller, C., Guichard, L., Makowski, D., Aveline, A., Girardin, P. y Plantureux, S. (2008). Agri-environmental indicators to assess cropping and farming systems. A review. Agronomy for sustainable development, 28, 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2007052
• Cabrera-Bosquet, L., Molero, G., Bort, J., Nogués, S. y Araus, J. L. (2007). The combined effect of constant water deficit and nitrogen supply on WUE, NUE and Δ13C in durum wheat potted plants. Annals of Applied Biology, 151(3), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2007.00195.x
• Cao, Y., Chen, S., Wang, L., Zhu, B., Lu, T. y Yu, Y. (2019). An Agricultural Drought Index for Assessing Droughts Using a Water Balance Method: A Case Study in Jilin Province, Northeast China. Remote Sensing, 11(9), 1066. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11091066
• Calvo-Brenes, G. (2013). Modelo de predicción de la calidad del agua en ríos basado en índices e indicadores del recurso hídrico y el entorno socio ambiental. [Tesis de Doctorado, Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica]. Repositorio Institucional del Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica. https://repositoriotec.tec.ac.cr/bitstream/handle/2238/3928/predicci%c3%b3n_agua_rios_doctorado.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
• Clarck, M. y Tilman, D. (2017). Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice. Environmental Research Letters, 12(6), 064016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6cd5
• Dardonville, M., Legrand, B., Clivot, H., Bernardin, C., Bockstaller, C. y Therond, O. (2022). Assessment of ecosystem services and natural capital dynamics in agroecosystems. Ecosystem Services, 54, 101415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101415
• De Marco, L., Carpenter, W., Liu, H., Biswas, R., Bowman, J. M. y Tokmakoff, A. (2016). Differences in the Vibrational Dynamics of H(2)O and D(2)O: Observation of Symmetric and Antisymmetric Stretching Vibrations in Heavy Water. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 7(10), 1769-1774. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00668
• Duru, M., Therond, O., Martin, G., Martin-Clouaire, R., Magne, M. A., Justes, E., Journet, E. P., Aubertot, J. N., Savary, S., Bergez, J. E. y Sarthou, J. P. (2015). How to implement biodiversity- based agriculture to enhance ecosystem services: a review. Agronomy for sustainable development, 35, 1259-1281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0306-1
• Espinosa-Morales, J. C., Escalona-Maurice, M. J., Ortega-Méndez, C. I. y Hernández-Juárez M. (2021). Generation of socio-environmental indicators in the territorial structure of San Luis Huexotla, Texcoco, México. Agroproductividad, 14(4), 105-111. https://doi.org/10.32854/agrop.v14i4.1861
• Fuglie, K., Benton, T., Sheng, Y., Hardelin, J., Mondelaers, K. y Laborde, D. (2016). G20 MACS white paper: Metrics of sustainable agricultural productivity. Información disponible en: https://www.oecd.org/tad/events/G20%20MACS%20WP%20Ag%20Productivity%20Metrics%20 4-26-2016_Final.pdf
• Gabrielsen, P. y Bosch, P. (2003). Environmental indicators: typology and use in reporting. Información disponible en: http://costabalearsostenible.es/ATenpdf/2.Hor/Sistemaindicadores/Key%20References_Indicators/EEA%202003.pdf
• Garbach, K., Milder, J. C., Montenegro, M., Karp, D. S. y DeClerck, F. A. J. (2014). Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Agroecosystems. Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems, 2, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-52512-3.00013-9
• Garcés, S. (2010). Bienestar y sustentabilidad en el medio rural: análisis de tres agroecosistemas (uno agroecológico, uno convencional y uno mixto) en Carchi y Esmeraldas a través de indicadores multidimensionales. [Tesis de Maestría, Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales-FLACSO]. Repositorio Institucional de la Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales. Ecuador. https://repositorio.flacsoandes.edu.ec/bitstream/10469/2384/11/TFLACSO-04-SGJ2010.pdf
• Georgakakos, C. B., Morris, C.K. y Walter, M. T. (2018). Challenges and Opportunities With On-Farm Research: Total and Soluble Reactive Stream Phosphorus Before and After Implementation of a Cattle-Exclusion, Riparian Buffer. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 6, 71. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00071
• Godínez-Montoya, L., García-Salazar, J., Fortis-Hernández, M., Mora-Flores, J., Martínez-Damián, M., Valdivia-Alcalá, R. y Hernández-Martínez, J. (2007). Valor económico del agua en el sector agrícola de la Comarca Lagunera. Terra Latinoamericana, 25(1), 51-59. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/573/57311513007.pdf
• Grassini, P., Eskridge, K. M. y Cassman, K. G. (2013). Distinguishing between yield advances and yield plateaus in historical crop production trends. Nature communications, 4(1), 2918. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3918
• Grunewald, K., Bastian, O. (2015). Ecosystem Services—Concept, Methods and Case Studies. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44143-5
• Haines-Young, R. y Potschin, M. B. (2018). Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure. Información disponible en: https://cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2018/01/Guidance-V51-01012018.pdf
• Häyhä, T. y Franzese, P. (2014). Ecosystem services assessment: A review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective. Ecological Modelling, 289, 124-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.07.002
• Kandziora, M., Burkhard, B. y Müller, F. (2013). Mapping provisioning ecosystem services at the local scale using data of varying spatial and temporal resolution. Ecosystem Services, 4, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.001
• Leinfelder, F., Tonello, K., Leal, M. y Correa, C. (2019). Socio-environmental indicators in the integrated river basin management at the Sorocaba metropolitan region, São Paulo state, southeastern Brazil. Sociedade & Natureza, 31, e38708. https://doi.org/10.14393/SN-v31-2019-38708
• Müller, F., Bicking, S., Ahrendt, K., Kinh, B. D., Blindow, I., Fürst, C., Haase, P., Kruse, M., Kruse, T., Ma, L., Perennes, M., Ruljevic, I., Schernewski, G., Schimming, C. G., Schneiders, A., Schubert, H., Schumacher, J., Tappeiner, U., Wangai, P., Windhorst, W. y Zeleny J. (2020). Assessing ecosystem service potentials to evaluate terrestrial, coastal and marine ecosystem types in Northern Germany – An expert-based matrix approach. Ecological Indicators, 112, 106116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106116
• Pe'er, G., Bonn, A., Bruelheide, H., Dieker, P., Eisenhauer, N., Feindt, P. H., Hagedorn, G., Hansjürgens, B., Herzon, I., Lomba, Â., Marquard, E., Moreira, F., Nitsch, H., Oppermann, R., Perino, A., Röder, N., Schleyer, C., Schindler, S., Wolf, C., Zinngrebe, Y. y Lakner, S. (2020). Action needed for the EU Common Agricultural Policy to address sustainability challenges. People and Nature, 2(2), 305-316. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10080
• Poikane, S., Birk, S., Böhmer, J., Carvalho, L., de Hoyos, C., Gassner, H., Hellsten, S., Kelly, M., Solheim, A., Olin, M., Pall, K., Phillips, G., Portielje, R., Ritterbusch, R., Sandin, L., Schartau, A., Solimini, A., van den Berg, M., Wolfram, G. y van de Bund, W. (2015). A hitchhiker's guide to European lake ecological assessment and intercalibration. Ecological indicators, 52, 533-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.005
• Porter, J., Costanza, R., Sandhu, H., Sigsgaard, L. y Wratten, S. (2009). The value of producing food, energy, and ecosystem services within an agro-ecosystem. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 38, 186-193. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-38.4.186
• Rodríguez, V., Gaspart, F., Kastner, T. y Meyfroidt, P. (2020). Agricultural intensification and land use change: assessing country-level induced intensification, land sparing and rebound effect. Environmental Research Letters, 15(8), 085007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8b14
• Salou, T., Le Mouël, C. y van der Werf, H. M. G. (2017). Environmental impacts of dairy system intensification: the functional unit matters. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 445-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.019
• Sarandón, S. J. (2002). El desarrollo y uso de indicadores para evaluar la sustentabilidad de los agroecosistemas. En S. J. Sarandón (Ed.), Agroecología: El camino para una agricultura sustentable (pp 393-414). E.C.A Ediciones Cientificas Americanas. https://kapixawa.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/sustentabilidad_sarandon.pdf
• Silva, J. V., Reidsma, P. Y van Ittersum, M. K. (2017). Yield gaps in Dutch arable farming systems: analysis at crop and crop rotation level. Agricultural Systems, 158, 78-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.06.005
• Sirami, C., Gross, N., Baillod, A. B., Bertrand, C., Carrié, R., Hass, A., Henckel, L., Miguet, P., Vuillot, C., Alignier, A., Girard, J., Batary, P., Clough, Y., Violle, C., Giralt, D., Bota, G., Badenhausser, I., Lefebvre, G., Gauffre, B., Vialatte, A., Calatayud, F., Gil, T. A., Tischendorf, L., Mitchell, S., Lindsay, K., Georges, R., Hilaire, S., Recasens, J., Solé-Senan, X. O., Robleño, I., Bosch, J., Barrientos, J. A., Ricarte, A., Marcos-Garcia, M. A. , Minano, J., Mathevet, R., Gibon, A., Baudry, J., Balent, G., Poulin, B., Burel, F., Tscharntke, T., Bretagnolle, V., Siriwardena, G., Ouin, A., Brotons, L., Martin, J. L. y Fahrig, L. (2019). Increasing crop heterogeneity enhances multitrophic diversity across agricultural regions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(33), 16442-16447. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1906419116
• Soulé, E, Michonneau, P., Michel, N. y Bockstaller, C. (2021). Environmental sustainability assessment in agricultural systems: a conceptual and methodological review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 325, 129291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129291
• Therond, O., Duru, M., Roger-Estrade, J. y Richard, G. (2017). A new analytical framework of farming system and agriculture model diversities. A review. Agronomy for sustainable development, 37(21), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0429-7
• Tischer, V. (2013). Indicadores socioambientais aplicados nos municípios costeiros do litoral centro-norte de Santa Catarina, com ênfase nos promontórios costeiros. Información disponible en: http://www6.univali.br/tede/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=1170
• Van der Werf, H. M. G., Knudsen, M. T. y Cederberg, C. (2020). Towards better representation of organic agriculture in life cycle assessment. Nature Sustainability, 3(6), 419-425. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0489-6
• Velázquez, L. J. y D’Armas, M. (2013). Indicadores de desarrollo sostenible para la planificación y toma de decisiones en el Municipio Caroní. Universidad, Ciencia y Tecnología, 17(66), 19-27. http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1316-48212013000100003&lng=es&nrm=iso
• Wei, C. A., Burnside, W. R. y Che-Castaldo, J. P. (2015). Teaching socio-environmental synthesis with the case studies approach. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 5(1), 42-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-014-0204-x
• Zafra, C., Temprano, J. y Tejero, I. (2017). The physical factors affecting heavy metals accumulated in the sediment deposited on road surfaces in dry weather: A review. Urban Water Journal, 14(6), 639-649. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2016.1223320
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Direitos autorais (c) 2025 Revista Sistemas de Producción Agroecológicos
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Esta revista y sus artículos se punlican bajo la licencia Creative Commons (CC BY – NC-ND 4.0), que permite el uso, distribución y reproducción sin restricciones en cualquier medio o formato, siempre que se acredite el autor y la fuente originales; no usar bajo propósitos comerciales.
