Influential Factors in Mobility from the Public Management Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22579/23463910.44Keywords:
transport, urban transport, public policy, public administration, resource allocationAbstract
This research analyzes the factors that influence mobility in the center and north of the city of Armenia from the viewpoint of governance. different factors of political, economic, social, cultural, infrastructural and administrative, in order to assess the management of public administration and policy analysis in infrastructure socio-economic development is studied, social welfare and region. The results presented are obtained from the first phase of research completed. The methodological design is part of an investigation of analytical and empirical cut mixed approach, which is made up of three stages: the first quantitative in nature through surveys Likert applied to a sample of private drivers; the second, qualitative court, where a sub-sample of public sector actors is investigated through interviews; and a third where a glut of data mediated grounded theory develops. Finally, correlation of variables is made, through multivariate analysis method. Consequently, a correlation is determined by three influential factors, such as: knowledge of public administration, ease of acquisition of financial credits for vehicles, and the absence of public policies to improve mobility. administrative and social - is a direct correlation between the influential political factors were also identified. In addition, a second correlation between administrative and cultural factors is given. These aspects produce inadequate policies to address the problem of mobility, which is to propose inputs that contribute to raise political and strategic direction of mobility.
References
Betancurt, M y Ramírez, C. (2008). Política Pública Territorial. Bogotá D.C.: Escuela Superior de Administración Pública.
Conpes 3572. (2015). Políticas en trasporte. Bogotá.
Almond, G., y Powell, B. (1978). Políticas Comparativas: sistema, proceso y política. Little Brown.
Guy Peters, B. (1999). La políticade la burocracia. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Johnson, E. R. (2004). Texto del Alumno. Cochabamba: Universidad Mayor de San Simón.
Nicolás, B. S. (2012). Hacia una movilidad urbana sostenible.
Páez Díaz de León, L. (21 de junio de 2001). La teoría sociológica de Max Weber. Obtenido de https://books.google.com.co
Patton. (19990). Comentario acerca de las evaluaciones cualitativas
Sánchez, J. J. (2001). La administración pública como ciencia: su objeto y su estudio. México: Plaza y Valdés.
Sánchez Moron, M. (1998). Sistema político local. Madrid: Marcial Pons.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa. Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoríafundamentada. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia.
Vasconcellos, E. A. (2010). Análisis de la movilidad urbana. Bogotá: CAF.
Waldo, D. (1964). Estudio de la Administración Pública. Madrid: Aguilar.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Martha Lucia García Londoño

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author must review the editorial policy of the GEON Journal.
To increase their visibility, documents are sent to databases and indexing systems.
The content of the articles is the responsibility of each author and does not compromise, in any way, the magazine or the institution.