Software for the Diagnosis of Accumulated Stock of Social Capital in the Business Context. An Alternative to Business Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22579/23463910.53Keywords:
Software, Closed capital, Associativity, Social Values, Information SystemAbstract
Participation in networking is an alternative to generate greater competitiveness in the business context, so that the development of social capital based on the recognition of social values becomes a necessary step to promote cohesion within organizations input. Social capital as an intangible asset of a community or cluster, is based on the recognition of the social structure, which from the associativity produces public and private benefits. Structuralism as an epistemological foundation of capital from sociology identifies the elements that legitimizes networks to exist; however, one can not say that the capital is limited to networks only because it involves an intangible cognitive dimension of social values such as trust and reciprocity. In the case of this project it is working on creating a tool to devise strategies to strengthen the social capital within organizations from recognition of cognitive and structural dimensions, in order to generate interaction with other organizations and likewise strengthen relations. In this sense, a software to measure the capacity to generate capital within each organization is proposed. Software development will take place and finally implemented in medium-sized enterprises, it shall be based on a methodology based on the process lifecycle of an information system.
References
Baquero, M. (2011). Desarrollo sostenible, capital social y empoderamiento en América Latina enel siglo XXI. Otra economía, 1 -16.
Bourdieu, P. (1988). La distinción. Madrid: Taurus.
Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology , 95 -120.
Coleman, J. (2001). Capital social y creación de capital humano. Zona abierta, 47 -81.
Fukuyama, F. (1998). Confianza. Barcelona: Grupo Zeta.
Grootaert , C., & Bastelaer, T. (2001). Understanding and measuring social capital. The World Bank, 1 -45.
Hanifan, L. (1916). The Rural School Community Center. American Academy of political and Social Science, 130 -138.
Montaño, S. (2001). Políticas de empoderamiento para la mujer como estrategia de lucha contra la pobreza. Santiago de Chile: Cepal.
Ostrom, E. (2011). El gobierno de los bienes comunes. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Putnam, R. (1994). Para hacer que la democracia funcione: la experiencia italiana en descentralización administrativa.Caracas: Galac.
Revista Dinero (2016). El software se está convirtiendo en una locomotora de la economía. Disponibleen: http://www.dinero.com/edicion-impresa/negocios/articulo/aporte-del-mercado-de-la-fabricacion-de-software-en-la-economia-colombiana/226420
Sen, G. (1998). Development Crises and Alternative Visions: Third World Women's Perspectives. New York: Routledge.Scrum Alliance (2012, marzo 28).
Scrum: the basics [Intenet], Disponible en: https://www.scrumalliance.org/why-scrum
Sommerville, Ian (2005). Ingeniería del Software. Madrid: Pearson.
Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (1998). Capital social: impicaciones para la teoria, la investigacion y las politicas sobre desarrollo. The world Banc Research Observer Vo 15 No 2, 225-250.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Luz Stella García Monsalve, Manuel Fernando Cabrera Jiménez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author must review the editorial policy of the GEON Journal.
To increase their visibility, documents are sent to databases and indexing systems.
The content of the articles is the responsibility of each author and does not compromise, in any way, the magazine or the institution.