Evaluation of the digital marketing mix of virtual self-service sales platforms in Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22579/23463910.212Keywords:
Digital marketing, Virtual plataforms, Website QualityAbstract
This research addresses the evaluation and analysis of the components of the digital marketing mix (product, price, place, promotion and -5P- platform) embodied in the virtual self-service sales platforms in Colombia. In Colombia it is evident the lack of dynamism to take advantage of all the benefits that e-commerce and digital marketing can offer to the companies, which can contribute to their development and growth. This research intends to identify, classify, evaluate and analyze the digital marketing mix of the virtual sales platforms of the self-services existing in Colombia. The research methodology developed is of a quantitative approach, the scope is descriptive, the design is of a non-experimental transversal nature, the technique used is that of content analysis and the instrument for the collection of information is the questionnaire. This research found that the vast majority of virtual sales platforms use various digital marketing tools that create a unique and enjoyable experience for the customer, in line with the theory of this branch of the discipline, in terms of its structure (5 P) and models for evaluating websites. The vast majority of self-service virtual sales platforms in Colombia analyzed present a very pertinent structure in terms of the digital marketing mix and, give an account of the solution to the problems that existed some years ago, making this tool a commercial boost for these companies.
JEL Codes: M Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Staff economy. M3 Marketing and Advertising. M31 Marketing.
References
Acosta Herrera, D., & Martínez Bohórquez, A. (2018). Marketing Digital y su evolución en Colombia. Recuperado el abril de 2020, de Universidad Libre de Colombia: https://repository.unilibre.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10901/11280/Marketing%20Digital%20y%20su%20Evoluci%C3%B3n%20en%20Colombia.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
AECEM. (2009). Libro blanco del comercio electrónico. Guía práctica de comercio electrónico para PYMES. Recuperado el 2020, de https://libros.metabiblioteca.org/bitstream/001/243/8/AECEM_Libro_Blanco.pdf
Allen, E., & Fjermestad, J. (2002). E-Commerce Strategies: The Manufacturer Retailer Consumer Relationship. Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2000/67
Andréu, J. (2018). Las técnicas de Análisis de Contenido: Una revisión actualizada. Recuperado el Noviembre de 2016, de http://mastor.cl/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Andreu.-analisis-de-contenido.-34-pags-pdf.pdf
Azadi, S., & Rahimzadeh, E. (s.f.). Developing marketing strategy for electronic business by ussing McCarthy`s four marketing mix model and Porter`s five competitive forces, 2(2012), 47, https://doi.org/10.5195/emaj.2012.25
Barnes, S. V. (2002). An integrative approach to the assessment of e-commerce quality. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 3(3), 115-116, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220437591_An_Integrative_Approach_to_the_Assessment_of_E-Commerce_Quality
Bizhanova, K., Mamyrbekov, A., Umarov, I., Orazymbetova, A., & Khairullaeva, A. (2019). Impact of digital marketing development on entrepreneurship. E3S Web of Conferences 135, 04023 (pág. 3). ITESE, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201913504023
Centro Nacional de Consultoría. (2019). Medición de indicadores -Tendencia de la oferta de Bienes y Servicios en línea-. Recuperado el mayo de 2020, de https://www.mintic.gov.co/portal/604/articles-102717_recurso_1.pdf
Chaffey, D., & Ellis-Chadwick, F. (2014). Marketing digital, estrategia, implementación y práctica. México: Pearson Educación.
Chaffey, D., & Smith, P. (2013). EMarketing Excellence. México: New York.
Chaffey, D., Ellis-Chadwick, F., Johnston, K., & Mayer, R. (2006). Internet Marketing. Strategy, Implementation and Practice. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Consejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social. (2009). Documento Conpes 3620 de 2009. Recuperado el 2020, de https://habeasdatacolombia.uniandes.edu.co/wp-content/uploads/conpes-3620-comerci-electronico-9-nov-2009.pdf
Constantinides, E. (2002). The 4S Web-Marketing Mix model. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 1, 58-60, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-4223(02)00006-6
González, O. B. (2013). El índice cuantitativo de calidad web como instrumento objetivo de medición de la calidad de sitios web corporativos. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 2013(19), 19-29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedee.2012.07.004
Hernández, R. F. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación. 6 ed. México: McGraw Hill Education.
Kannan, P., & Li, H. (2016). Digital marketing: A framework, review and research agenda. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 4-5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.006
La República. (1º de agosto de 2019). Las transacciones digitales representaron 8,5% del PIB de Colombia para 2018. Recuperado el 2020, de https://www.larepublica.co/empresas/las-transacciones-digitales-representaron-85-del-pib-de-colombia-para-2018-2891715
Liacono, E. W. (2014). WEBQUAL: A measure of website quality. Research Gate. AMA Winter Conference, 9-12, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248412208_WebQual_A_Measure_of_Web_Site_Quality
Miranda, F. B. (2005). La banca por internet en España. Aplicación del índice de Evaluación (IEW). Boletín Económico de ICE 2005, 2005(2855), 18-21, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/28116705_La_banca_por_Internet_en_Espana_aplicacion_del_Indice_de_Evaluacion_Web_IEW
Observatorio e-Commerce Colombia. (2016). 4to Estudio Transacciones Digitales: eCommerce & Recaudo Colombia 2016 – Primer semestre 2017. Recuperado el mayo de 2020, de https://www.observatorioecommerce.com.co/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Cuarto-Estudio-de-Transacciones-Digitales-eCommerce-Recaudo-Colombia-2016-y-primer-semestre-del-2017.pdf
Observatorio eCommerce Colombia. (2019). Medición de Indicadores de consumo del Observatorio eCommerce. Recuperado el mayo de 2020, de https://www.observatorioecommerce.com.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/estudio-consumo-ecommerce-colombia-observatorio-2019.pdf
Observatorio eCommerce. (2017). Transacciones Digitales Colombia: eCommerce & Recaudo. Recuperado el mayo de 2020, de https://www.observatorioecommerce.com.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/4TO-ESTUDIO-DE-TRANSACCIONES-DIGITALES-EN-COLOMBIA-2016-2017-1.pdf
Olsina, L. R. (2002). A quantitative method for quality evaluation of web sites and applications. IEEE Multimedia, 9(4), 5-6, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228574962_A_quantitative_method_for_quality_evaluation_of_web_sites_and_applications
Park, Y. G. (2007). Sucess factors for destination marketing web sites: A quantitative meta-analysis. Journal of Travel Research, 2007(46), 50, https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287507302381
Polillo, R. (2011). Quality model for web (2.0) sites: a methodological approach and a proposal. Lectures Trends in Web Engineering, 2011(7059), 8-10, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27997-3_25
Portal ISO 25000. (2016). ISO 25000 Calidad del producto software. ISO/IEC 25010. Obtenido de http://iso25000.com/index.php/normas-iso-25000/iso-25010
Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia. (2016). Estándares y modelos de calidad del software. Obtenido de http://datateca.unad.edu.co/contenidos/301569/AVA_2014_II_-_301569/AVA_ESTANDARES_Y_MODELOS_DE_CALIDAD_DEL_SOFTWARE.pdf
Zeithaml, V. P. (2002). Service quality delivery through web sites: A critical review of extant knowledge. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(49), 369, https://doi.org/10.1177/009207002236911
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Paula Andrea Mejia Henao, Yeimi Viviana Marín Chaves

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author must review the editorial policy of the GEON Journal.
To increase their visibility, documents are sent to databases and indexing systems.
The content of the articles is the responsibility of each author and does not compromise, in any way, the magazine or the institution.