Integration of technological and didactic tools in the development of competences focused on solving problems and making decisions.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22579/23463910.35Keywords:
Integration, tools, Technological, Didactic, LearningAbstract
This project proposes the integration of technological and didactic tools in the teaching of experimental and exact sciences under the approach and principles of the Substitution-Increase-Modification-Redefinition model (SAMR model). It is important to highlight that the SAMR model proposes a process that allows improving the quality of teaching and learning based on the integration of technological tools and teaching strategies. The integration of this model makes it clear that ICT can transform traditional learning environments into four progressive levels of impact (Substitution, Increase, Modification and Redefinition, hence the name of the SAMR model). However, it is important to keep in mind that not all technological tools will achieve all four levels in an inertial manner. In this sense, the teacher must select and integrate the tools taking into account the potential impact that in their opinion these can reach. In this project, the use of simulators as substitute elements of preexisting methodologies for the learning of essential topics in the area of exact and experimental sciences was prioritized. These simulators achieved different levels of impact when integrated with specific didactic tools. Under this approach, technological tools were applied in such a way that they could be conceived as a substitution, increase, modification or redefinition of other traditional tools, but with functional improvements. The incorporation of this model, at the end of the day, allowed students to enter into a dynamic of exploring, describing, explaining, evaluating and / or transforming, developing in them a critical, analytical and divergent thinking.
References
Competencias del siglo XXI en LatinoaméricaBanco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Extraídoa partir de: http://www.iadb.org
Working Paper 21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries, (EDU Working Paper No. 41), Instituto de Tecnologías educativas, Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos.
AA.VV. (2001) Evaluación de fuentes de información en Internet: Criterios de calidad. En: Ciencias de la Información Vol. 32, No. 2.
Baiget, T. (1986). Análisis de sistemas de información. Barcelona: Institut Catalá de Tecnología, 1986, 64 p.
Belcher, M. et al. (1999). DESIRE information gateways handbook.Obtenido a partir de: http://www.desire.orglhandbook/
Codina, L. (1998) Metodología de análisis de sistemas de información y diseño de bases de datos documentales: aspectos lógicos y funcionales.
BARÓ, J.; CID, P. (eds.). Anuario SOCADI de Documentación e Información 1998. Barcelona: SOCADI, 1998, p. 195-2105.
CONSEJO SUPERIOR DE INFORMÁTICA. (1993). Metodología deplanificación y desarrollo de sistemas de información.Madrid: Ministerio para las Administraciones Públicas, 1993,243 pp.
López, J.C. (2008). Modelo para Integrar TIC en el Currículo –Educadores.
Martí, J. (2013). El modelo SAMR.
Puentedura, R. (2006). Transformation, Technology, and Education.
Stake, R. E. (1995).Investigación con estudio de casos. Madrid: Morata,1995.
Duran y Castrillo, Ma Pilar (1981) "Case estudi metodologi: An epistemoloyicaladbocaci." A W.W. Welsh (ed.) Case study Methodology in Educational Evaluation. Proceedings of the 1981 Minnesot Evaluation Conference. Menneapolis: Minnesota Research and Evaluation Center, 1981.
Walker,R.(1983).La realización de estudios de casos en educación.Ética, teoría y procedimientos". A: W. Dockrell i D. Hamilton (Eds.) Nuevas reflexiones sobre la investigación educativa. Madrid: Narcea, 1983.
Yin, Robert K. (1994) Case Study Research. Design and Methods. London: SAGE, 1994.
Yin, Robert K..(1993).Applications of Case Study Research. London: SAGE, 1993.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Juan Antonio Sánchez Marquez, Nuria Sellares Alegre, Nohemí Aracely Hernández Muñoz, Mónica Mondelo Villaseñor

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author must review the editorial policy of the GEON Journal.
To increase their visibility, documents are sent to databases and indexing systems.
The content of the articles is the responsibility of each author and does not compromise, in any way, the magazine or the institution.